Proving Hostile Work Environment Claims in Florida

To prevail on a hostile work environment claim in Florida, an employee must establish that: (1) he or she belongs to a protected group, (2) he or she was subjected to unwelcome harassment, (3) the harassment was based on a protected characteristic, (4) the harassment was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the terms and conditions of his or her employment and create an abusive working environment, and (5) a basis exists for holding the employer liable. Gupta v. Fla. Bd. of Regents, 212 F.3d 571, 582 (11th Cir. 2000).

As to the first element, the Florida employee must belong to a protected group. For example, if the comments or behavior relate to an employee’s recently dyed pink hair color, the claim is not likely to succeed as “pink hair” is not a protected characteristic under the law.

As to the second element, the incident must be unwelcome. To satisfy this element, there must be some evidence that the employee opposed the allegedly hostile action. The third element goes hand in hand with the first element as the hostile behavior or comments must relate to the person’s protected characteristic.

The fourth element is generally the most challenging element for employees to meet. Courts have found that to establish that harassment was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the terms or conditions of employment, an employee must prove that the work environment was both subjectively and objectively hostile. Courts generally find that employees meet their burden to show that the environment was subjectively hostile if they provide testimony that the situations or comments caused them stress and affected their work environment.

In order for a work environment to be objectively hostile, courts consider four factors: (1) the frequency of the conduct; (2) the severity of the conduct; (3) whether the conduct is physically threatening or humiliating, or a mere offensive utterance; and (4) whether the conduct unreasonably interferes with the employee’s job performance. While these factors guide the analysis, courts must consider the totality of the circumstances.

For example, one court found that “roughly fifteen separate instances of harassment over the course of four months” was pervasive. Johnson v. Booker T. Wash. Broad. Serv., Inc., 234 F.3d 501, 509 (11th Cir. 2000). Other courts have found that certain offensive racial slurs and gestures are so offensive that a single incident may be sufficient to be considered severe as a matter of law.

The third factor is established by conduct that is “physically threatening or humiliating.” Mendoza v. Borden, Inc., 195 F.3d 1238, 1246 (11th Cir. 1999). For example, courts have found that racial slurs directed at the employee every day are humiliating enough to support this element of the claim. See Smelter v. S. Home Care Servs., Inc. 904 F.3d 1276, 1286 (11th Cir. 2018) (noting that “[i]t was surely humiliating for [plaintiff], a black woman, to hear a co-worker say that black people are ‘the scum of the earth,’ that [she] looked like a ‘mixed monkey,’ and that black people should be ‘sent back…to Africa.’”).

For the fourth factor, employees must provide evidence that the conduct unreasonably interfered with their job performance. However, the U.S. Supreme Court “has cautioned that harassment need not be … so extreme that it produces tangible effects on job performance in order to be actionable.” Miller v. Kenworth of Dothan, Inc., 277 F.3d 1269, 1277 (11th Cir. 2002).

Show More
Show Less

Get help now

Talk to a lawyer now

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Our Process
1.
Investigate

As a first step, your assigned legal team will gather and review records related to your claim, including any employment contract or offer letter, time sheets, any relevant communications, and any disciplinary actions, including performance improvement plans or termination paperwork.

These documents will help your attorneys evaluate your claims and develop a strategy to obtain the best results for your situation.

2.
Formulate

Once your legal team completes the initial investigation, they will work with you to determine the best legal strategy for your situation. Your legal team will make recommendations and will work with you to formulate the most effective approach to obtain your desired outcome.

3.
Advocate

After you and your legal team formulate the strategy, your legal team will advocate on your behalf to obtain your desired outcome. This could include negotiating a separation package, engaging in pre-suit negotiations, sending a demand letter, and/or filing a charge of discrimination or lawsuit on your behalf.

The attorneys at BT Law are experienced trial lawyers and will advocate for your rights in the courtroom as necessary.

Reviews

Jason and Anisley are one of the best decisions someone can make given the situation. They are knowledgeable, transparent, proactive and communicate with their clients. I have dealt with other attorneys in the past and I’m always frustrated because you don’t get information or you have to chase the attorney and staff down that’s not the case with them.

In finding the right lawyers to represent you, you want to have mutual respect and understanding for each other and clear communication to achieve your goals. BT Law Group is just that. They not only represented me to their fullest abilities, but went above and beyond to truly understand my goals and priorities and provide sound legal advice to achieve such. It was a pleasure working with both Anisley and Jason, I’d highly recommend them.

We very much enjoyed BT Law Group’s founding partner, Anisley Tarragona service and attention to detail. From the onset her approach was practical and conscious of providing the best legal advice while being mindful of suggesting cost effective, conservative solutions. We find her to be a great business partner to service all our employment related legal needs.

I received a prompt and very professional service by the BT Law Group. Ms Tarragona provides tailored advice in the best interest of the client. She was meticulous and explained the pros and cons of my case in very simple terms which allowed me to consider and take the best decision. Very happy with the service. Highly recommended.

Absolutely wonderful and professional services. Represented my mom in a caring and personalized manner. Knowledgeable and ethical. Thank you!

I always consult BT Law Group for employment law matters. They are responsive, practical and efficient. I recommend them to colleagues and friends.

Trusted advisors
Jason D. Berkowitz is a Founding Partner of BT Law Group, PLLC. Prior to starting BT Law, Mr. Berkowitz was a Partner in the Miami office of a national labor and employment law firm where he represented management exclusively.
Anisley Tarragona is a founding partner of BT Law Group, PLLC. Prior to starting BT Law, Ms. Tarragona worked in the Miami office of a national labor and employment law firm where she represented management exclusively. Ms. Tarragona, who was born and raised in Cuba, is fluent in Spanish.
UNPAID OVERTIME WAGES?